Basdeo v. Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home Insurance Company
Plaintiff: Mark A. Basdeo
Defendant: Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home Insurance Company
Case Number: 0:2011cv03399
Filed: November 21, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Jeanne J. Graham
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER DISCHARGING 4 Order to Show Cause. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 12/5/11. (kll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Basdeo v. Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home Insurance Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Unitrin Kemper Auto & Home Insurance Company
Represented By: Amy E Thompson
Represented By: Brian A Wood
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Mark A. Basdeo
Represented By: Timothy P McCarthy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?