Gyamtso et al v. New Metro Trucking Corporation et al
Plaintiff: Tsewang Gyamtso and Nawang Recho
Defendant: New Metro Trucking Corporation, John Doe and Mary Doe
Case Number: 0:2011cv03457
Filed: November 28, 2011
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Donovan W. Frank
Presiding Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 120 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants Motion for a New Trial; Altering or Amending a Judgment (Doc. No. 89 ) is DENIED. Plaintiffs Motion for an Award of Costs and Reasonable Attorneys Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 (Doc. No. 94 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and Plaintiffs are awarded $160,064.27 in attorneys fees and costs. (Written Opinion.) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 07/03/2014. (RLB)
May 20, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 50 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 38 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: 1. Defendants are entitled to judgment with respect to Counts III, IV, V, and VI of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 32 ). 2. Counts I and II of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 32 ) remain for trial. 3. Defendants are entitled to judgment with respect to Count VII of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 32 ) insofar as P laintiffs seek treble damages in connection with their RICO claim. To the extent Count VII seeks punitive damages with respect to Plaintiffs' claims of race discrimination, the damage claim remains for trial. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 5/20/2013. (BJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gyamtso et al v. New Metro Trucking Corporation et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tsewang Gyamtso
Represented By: Kenneth U Udoibok
Represented By: Brendan R Tupa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nawang Recho
Represented By: Brendan R Tupa
Represented By: Kenneth U Udoibok
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: New Metro Trucking Corporation
Represented By: Henry To
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mary Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?