Austin et al v. Metropolitan Council et al
Sammie Lee Austin, Terrance Williams and Dujuan Williams |
Metropolitan Council and Metro Transit |
0:2011cv03621 |
December 16, 2011 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Hennepin |
Steven E Rau |
Donovan W. Frank |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 27 ORDER GRATING FINAL APPROVAL OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN PLAINTIFFS AND THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL, CERTIFYING A SETTLEMENT CLASS, APPROVING PAYMENT OF SERVICE AWARDS AND ATTORNEY FEES AND EXPENSES, AND DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT. 1. The Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement Agreement and Release between Plaintiffs and Defendant, Certifying a Settlement Class, Approving Payment of Service Awards and Attorney Fees and Expenses, and For Entry of Final Judgment (Doc. No. [1 2]) is GRANTED in its entirety; 2. The parties shall forthwith proceed in good faith to implement the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, and of this Order; 3. A copy of this Order shall be posted on Defendants intranet system, available to all C lass Members, for thirty days after the issuance of this Order; and 4. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter throughout the Settlement Term, as provided in the Agreement. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/27/2012. (BJS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.