Ackerman v. PNC Bank, National Association et al
Plaintiff: Margaret K. Ackerman
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association, PNC Bank, National Association and Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2012cv00042
Filed: January 5, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1446
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 186 ORDER denying 182 Letter to Request Permission to File Motion to Reconsider filed by Margaret K. Ackerman (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 08/29/2014. (MJC)
January 23, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 162 ORDER denying 139 APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge and affirming 138 Order of 11/25/13 on Motion to Compel, Motion for Default Judgment, Motion for Sanctions, and Motion for Extension of Time (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/23/14. (MJC)
June 19, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 106 ORDER : 1. Defendant PNC Bank, National Association's, and Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association's Objections [Doc. No. 99] to the Magistrate Judge's April 10, 2013, Order [Doc. No. 95] are OVERRULED; and 2. The Magistrate Judge's April 10, 2013, Order [Doc. No. 95] is AFFIRMED (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 6/18/13. (LPH)
March 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 89 ORDER denying 35 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 3/7/13. (LPH)
August 13, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 26 ORDER denying 5 Plaintiff's Motion to Remand to State Court (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 08/13/2012. (jmf)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ackerman v. PNC Bank, National Association et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association
Represented By: Ankoor Bagchi
Represented By: David A Schooler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: PNC Bank, National Association
Represented By: Ankoor Bagchi
Represented By: David A Schooler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Ankoor Bagchi
Represented By: David A Schooler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Margaret K. Ackerman
Represented By: William-NA K. Forbes
Represented By: Christopher-NA Champagne
Represented By: Bryan R Battina
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?