Ferris & Salter, P.C. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation Featured Case
Plaintiff: Ferris & Salter, P.C.
Defendant: Thomson Reuters Corporation
Case Number: 0:2012cv00109
Filed: January 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Steven E Rau
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Other Personal Injury
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 15 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting defendant's 4 Motion to Dismiss the Professional Negligence Claim. Defendant shall file and serve an answer withtin 14 days.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 4, 2012. (DML)
July 11, 2012 Filing 14 Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge John R. Tunheim: Motion Hearing held on 7/11/2012 re 4 MOTION to Dismiss/General MOTION for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise plead filed by Thomson Reuters Corporation. Motion taken Under Advisement. Written order forthcoming. (Court Reporter Kristine Mousseau) (HAM)
June 29, 2012 Filing 13 AMENDED NOTICE of Hearing on Motion: 4 MOTION to Dismiss/General MOTION for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise plead : Motion Hearing set for 7/11/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 13E (MPLS) before Judge John R. Tunheim. (Rossman, John) Modified on 6/29/2012 (akl).
April 18, 2012 Filing 12 REPLY MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF 4 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO ENLARGE ANSWER PERIOD filed by Thomson Reuters Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate). (Koller, Peter) Modified text on 4/18/2012 (MMP).
April 4, 2012 Filing 11 RESPONSE, with CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE, re 6 Memorandum in Support of Motion, filed by Ferris & Salter, P.C. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate). (Ferris, Don) Modified text on 4/5/2012 (lmb).
April 4, 2012 Filing 10 RESPONSE re 4 MOTION to Dismiss/General MOTION for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise plead filed by Ferris & Salter, P.C.. (Ferris, Don)
April 4, 2012 Filing 9 DECLARATION of Don Ferris by Ferris & Salter, P.C. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1, # 2 Exhibit(s) 2, # 3 Exhibit(s) 3). (Ferris, Don) Modified text on 4/5/2012 (lmb).
March 15, 2012 Filing 8 *TEXT ONLY ENTRY* Notice to Attorney regarding Dispositive Motions briefing schedule: All dispositive motions must comply with Local Rule 7.1(b). Responses to dispositive motions shall be filed with the Court and served on or before 21 days after the service of the supporting memorandum to the original motion. Replies to responsive briefs shall be filed and served 14 days after the service of the response to the dispositive motion. Upon the motion being fully briefed and filed, counsel for the moving party shall email Judge Tunheims chambers at Tunheim_Chambers@mnd.uscourts.gov to request a hearing date. Upon receiving from Judge Tunheims calendar clerk a hearing date, time and location, the moving party shall file the amended notice of hearing at that time. (HAM)
March 14, 2012 Filing 7 Declaration of John K. Rossman in Support of 4 MOTION to Dismiss/General MOTION for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise plead filed by Thomson Reuters Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit(s) 1-3)(Koller, Peter)
March 14, 2012 Filing 6 MEMORANDUM in Support re 4 MOTION to Dismiss/General MOTION for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise plead filed by Thomson Reuters Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 LR7.1 Word Count Compliance Certificate)(Koller, Peter)
March 14, 2012 Filing 5 NOTICE OF HEARING ON MOTION re 4 MOTION to Dismiss: (Date and Time to Be Determined by Court). (Koller, Peter) Modified on 3/15/2012 (kt).
March 14, 2012 Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss/General , MOTION for Extension of Time to answer or otherwise plead by Thomson Reuters Corporation. (Koller, Peter)
February 6, 2012 Filing 3 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Ferris & Salter, P.C.. Ferris & Salter, P.C. waiver sent on 2/3/2012, answer due 4/3/2012. (Ferris, Don)
January 19, 2012 Opinion or Order TEXT ONLY ENTRY-ORDER granting 2 Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice of Attorney Don Ferris for Ferris & Salter, P.C.. Fee paid; receipt number 4-61507. Approved by Magistrate Judge Steven E Rau on 01/19/2012. (MAP)
January 13, 2012 Filing 2 MOTION for Admission Pro Hac Vice for Don Ferris by Ferris & Salter, P.C. (akl)
January 13, 2012 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Thomson Reuters Corporation, filed by Ferris & Salter, P.C. (Filing fee $ 350 receipt number 4061507) Assigned to Judge John R. Tunheim per Master List and referred to Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet) (akl)
January 13, 2012 Summons Issued as to Thomson Reuters Corporation. (akl)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ferris & Salter, P.C. v. Thomson Reuters Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Ferris & Salter, P.C.
Represented By: Don Ferris
Represented By: Mark Noel Jennings
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Thomson Reuters Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?