Clark v. Roy

Clark v. Roy

Plaintiff:	Nathan D. Clark
Defendant:	Tom Roy
Case Number:	0:2012cv00421
Filed:	February 16, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Chisago
Presiding Judge:	Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge:	Joan N. Ericksen
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 11, 2012	Filing 12 ORDER denying 11 Application on Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 11, 2012. (slf)
March 19, 2012	Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Docket No. 1] is DENIED.2.This action is summarily DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdi ction.3.Petitioners Motion for Authorization [Docket No. 5] is DISMISSED without prejudice.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 19, 2012. (slf) (cc: Nathan D. Clark) Modified on 3/19/2012 (akl).

Date Filed

Document Text

May 11, 2012

Filing 12 ORDER denying 11 Application on Proceed In Forma Pauperis on Appeal (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 11, 2012. (slf)

March 19, 2012

Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. IT IS ORDERED THAT:1.Petitioners application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 [Docket No. 1] is DENIED.2.This action is summarily DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdi ction.3.Petitioners Motion for Authorization [Docket No. 5] is DISMISSED without prejudice.LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on March 19, 2012. (slf) (cc: Nathan D. Clark) Modified on 3/19/2012 (akl).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clark v. Roy
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Tom Roy
Represented By:	David C Brown
Represented By:	Matthew Frank
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nathan D. Clark
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?