Zuniga v. Fisher
Petitioner: Albert Zuniga
Respondent: Scott P. Fisher
Case Number: 0:2012cv00478
Filed: February 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Pine
Presiding Judge: Steven E Rau
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER ADOPTING 4 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: 1. Petitioner's Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, (Docket No. 3), is DENIED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/17/12. (LPH) cc: Albert Zuniga. Modified on 10/17/2012 (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Zuniga v. Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Albert Zuniga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott P. Fisher
Represented By: Gregory G Brooker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?