Fearing v. Cold Spring Granite Company
Plaintiff: Jamie C. Fearing
Defendant: Cold Spring Granite Company
Case Number: 0:2012cv00638
Filed: March 12, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Stearns
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 21, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER that all proceedings before Judge Richard H. Kyle (motions, trial, etc.) will be held in the U.S. Courthouse in Fergus Falls, Minnesota. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 03/21/12. (kll)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Fearing v. Cold Spring Granite Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jamie C. Fearing
Represented By: Kathryn M Engdahl
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Cold Spring Granite Company
Represented By: Michael J Ford
Represented By: Melinda M Sanders
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?