Watts v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation et al
| Byron T Watts |
| Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Anna Restovich Braun, Roxanne L. Darnell, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and David E. Mueller |
| 0:2012cv00692 |
| March 19, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Olmsted |
| Janie S. Mayeron |
| Susan Richard Nelson |
| Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2409 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
63
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS 54 . Wells Fargo's and Freddie Mac's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint 21 is GRANTED; Wells Fargo's and Freddie Mac's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint [4 1] is GRANTED; This action against Wells Fargo and Freddie Mac is DISMISSED with prejudice; Defendants David E. Mueller and Roxanne L. Darnell's Motion to Dismiss under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 and for a More Definite Statement under Fed. R. Civ.P. 12(e) 3 is GRANTED; and this action against David E. Mueller and Roxanne L. Darnell is DISMISSED without prejudice.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/24/2013. (jmf)
|
|
Filing
15
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER : 1. Plaintiff's Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order [Docket No. 9] is DENIED; and 2. The Order of Referral [Doc. No. 13] is VACATED (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 5/25/12. (LPH)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
