Preston v. Wisconsin Staffing Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Catherina J. Preston
Defendant: Wisconsin Staffing Services, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2012cv00797
Filed: March 29, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Rice
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Presiding Judge: Steven E. Rau
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 16, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER granting 2 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; denying 8 Motion to Transfer/Change Venue (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 7/16/2012. (PJM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Preston v. Wisconsin Staffing Services, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Catherina J. Preston
Represented By: Andrea B Niesen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wisconsin Staffing Services, Inc.
Represented By: Joel L Aberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?