Comfort Attiogbe-Tay v. SE Rolling Hills LLC
Plaintiff: Comfort Attiogbe-Tay
Defendant: SE Rolling Hills LLC
Case Number: 0:2012cv01109
Filed: May 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Scott
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Nature of Suit: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER granting 16 Motion for Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 11/7/2013. (PJM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Comfort Attiogbe-Tay v. SE Rolling Hills LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Comfort Attiogbe-Tay
Represented By: Howard L Bolter
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SE Rolling Hills LLC
Represented By: Robert C Castle
Represented By: Elizabeth A Patton
Represented By: Aaron Mills Scott
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?