Kramer et al v. Ford Motor Company et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 29, 2015
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 136 Motion to Appoint Expert Pursuant to Federal Evidence Rule 706 and to Amend the Scheduling Order, as set forth in the Order. The deadlines in the scheduling order are amended as follows: (a). If Pla intiffs decide to amend the expert report of Neil Hannemann as allowed herein, full disclosure of the substance of his amended testimony shall be made by Plaintiffs on or before March 31, 2015. If Defendant decides to amend the report of any of its e xpert witnesses in response, full disclosure of the substance of the testimony to be offered by those witnesses shall be made by Defendant on or before June 1, 2015. (b). If Defendant decides to re-depose Mr. Hannemann, it shall do so on or before June 1, 2015. If Defendant submits an amended report of any of its experts, Plaintiffs may re-depose those witnesses on or before July 31, 2015. (c). All motions for summary judgment and motions to exclude expert testimony shall be filed and served o n or before September 15, 2015. (d). This case shall be ready for trial on and after January 15, 2016, at which time it will be placed on the Court's jury trial calendar. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/29/15. (SMD)
|August 20, 2014
ORDER denying without prejudice 64 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying without prejudice 69 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; denying without prejudice 75 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; denying without prejudice 81 Motion to Exclude Expert Testimony; denying as moot and without prejudice 117 Motion for Protective Order (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 08/20/2014. (SMD)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?