Public Record Media, LLC v. U.S. Department of Justice

Justia Dockets & Filings Eighth Circuit Minnesota District Court Public Record Media, LLC v. U.S. Department of Justice

Public Record Media, LLC v. U.S. Department of Justice

Plaintiff:	Public Record Media, LLC
Defendant:	U.S. Department of Justice
Case Number:	0:2012cv01225
Filed:	May 22, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Ramsey
Presiding Judge:	Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit:	Freedom of Information Act
Cause of Action:	05 U.S.C. § 552
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 7, 2013	Filing 43 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant's letter request for permission to file a motion for reconsideration 41 shall be deemed a Motion for Reconsideration, and Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration 41 is DENIED. 2. The January 29, 2013 Order 29 shall be designated as a Report and Recommendation. 3. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated January 29, 2013 29 . 4. Plaintiff is granted an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $7,500, plus its $350 filing fee, for a total award of $7,850. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/7/13. (GRR)
May 7, 2013	Filing 40 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Chief United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan's January 29, 2013 Order 29 is AFFIRMED. 2. Defendant's objections to that Order 33 are OVERRULED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/7/13. (GRR)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 7, 2013

Filing 43 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Defendant's letter request for permission to file a motion for reconsideration 41 shall be deemed a Motion for Reconsideration, and Defendant's Motion for Reconsideration 41 is DENIED. 2. The January 29, 2013 Order 29 shall be designated as a Report and Recommendation. 3. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated January 29, 2013 29 . 4. Plaintiff is granted an award of attorney's fees in the amount of $7,500, plus its $350 filing fee, for a total award of $7,850. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 6/7/13. (GRR)

May 7, 2013

Filing 40 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Chief United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan's January 29, 2013 Order 29 is AFFIRMED. 2. Defendant's objections to that Order 33 are OVERRULED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/7/13. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Public Record Media, LLC v. U.S. Department of Justice
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Public Record Media, LLC
Represented By:	Jonathan T Haines
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: U.S. Department of Justice
Represented By:	Mary J Madigan
Represented By:	Amy E. Powell
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?