Pinsonneault v. St. Jude Medical, Inc. et al
Richard J. Pinsonneault |
St. Jude Medical, Inc. and Pacesetter, Inc. |
0:2012cv01717 |
July 17, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Janie S. Mayeron |
Patrick J. Schiltz |
Personal Injury: Health Care |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 120 ORDER re (118 in 0:12-cv-01717-PJS-JSM) (116 in 0:12-cv-1785-PJS-JSM) (112 in 0:12-cv-2396-PJS-JSM) Letter to Request for Permission to File Motion to Reconsider. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT plaintiffs' letter request to bring a motion for recon sideration [ECF No. 118 in 12-CV-1717; ECF No. 116 in 12-CV-1785; and ECF No. 112 in 12-CV-2396] is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on July 30, 2014. Associated Cases: 0:12-cv-01717-PJS-JSM, 0:12-cv-01785-PJS-JSM, 0:12-cv-02396-PJS-JSM(CLG) |
Filing 117 ORDER - Defendants' motions for summary judgment 97 in 12-CV-1717; ECF No. 96 in 12-CV-1785; and ECF No. 92 in 12-CV-2396 are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motions are DENIED to the extent that they seek dismissal of plaintiffs& #039; claims alleging that defendants failed to comply with state-law requirements that paralleled federal requirements regarding sterilization. The motions are GRANTED in all other respects. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 06/24/14. (BJS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.