Wagner v. Gallup, Inc.

Wagner v. Gallup, Inc.

Plaintiff:	Rodd Wagner
Defendant:	Gallup, Inc.
Case Number:	0:2012cv01816
Filed:	July 25, 2012
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Carver
Presiding Judge:	Joan N. Ericksen
Presiding Judge:	Tony N. Leung
Nature of Suit:	Employment
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
June 20, 2014	Filing 172 ORDER: Plaintiff's motion in limine [Docket No. 96 ] is DENIED as moot. Defendant's motions in limine [Docket Nos. 102 and 108 ] are DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's motion and amended motion to compel [Docket Nos. 132 and 148 ] a re DENIED as stated on the record at the pretrial conference on April 7, 2014. Defendant's motion to quash [Docket No. 153 ] is GRANTED in part as stated on the record at the pretrial conference on April 7, 2014. Attorney Michelle Dye Neumann shall pay to Defendant Gallup Inc. a sanction in the amount of $2,000 toward its fees and costs to quash the subpoenas served on its executives, Jim Clifton and Jane Miller. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on June 20, 2014. (CBC)
December 20, 2013	Filing 91 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Relief under Rule 56(d) 60 is DENIED as moot. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 52 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count One of Plaintiff's complaint alleging age discrimination in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act is dismissed with prejudice. (Written Opinion) Please see order for complete details. Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 19, 2013. (CBC)

Date Filed

Document Text

June 20, 2014

Filing 172 ORDER: Plaintiff's motion in limine [Docket No. 96 ] is DENIED as moot. Defendant's motions in limine [Docket Nos. 102 and 108 ] are DENIED as moot. Plaintiff's motion and amended motion to compel [Docket Nos. 132 and 148 ] a re DENIED as stated on the record at the pretrial conference on April 7, 2014. Defendant's motion to quash [Docket No. 153 ] is GRANTED in part as stated on the record at the pretrial conference on April 7, 2014. Attorney Michelle Dye Neumann shall pay to Defendant Gallup Inc. a sanction in the amount of $2,000 toward its fees and costs to quash the subpoenas served on its executives, Jim Clifton and Jane Miller. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on June 20, 2014. (CBC)

December 20, 2013

Filing 91 ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion for Relief under Rule 56(d) 60 is DENIED as moot. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 52 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Count One of Plaintiff's complaint alleging age discrimination in violation of the Minnesota Human Rights Act is dismissed with prejudice. (Written Opinion) Please see order for complete details. Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on December 19, 2013. (CBC)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wagner v. Gallup, Inc.
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodd Wagner
Represented By:	Brian T Rochel
Represented By:	Michelle Dye Neumann
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Gallup, Inc.
Represented By:	Marko J Mrkonich
Represented By:	Anne P Zorn
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?