Silva v. Fisher
Petitioner: Natividad Silva
Respondent: Scott P. Fisher
Case Number: 0:2012cv01934
Filed: August 7, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 9, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopting 3 Report and Recommendation;denying 2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 10/09/2012. (TLU) CC: Natividad Silva on 10/9/2012 (MMP).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Silva v. Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott P. Fisher
Represented By: Gregory G Brooker
Represented By: Erika R Mozangue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Natividad Silva
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?