James v. Christainson

Plaintiff: Gary James
Defendant: Daniel Christainson
Case Number: 0:2012cv02002
Filed: August 15, 2012
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Rice
Referring Judge: Tony N. Leung
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
November 6, 2012 7 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 4 denying 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Written Opinion). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED; and 2. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on November 6, 2012. (clg) (cc: Gary James) Modified on 11/6/2012 (jz).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James v. Christainson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Gary James
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Daniel Christainson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?