Ries v. VEC Technology, L.L.C. et al

Plaintiff: Charles W Ries
Defendant: VEC Technology, L.L.C.
Case Number: 0:2012cv02039
Filed: August 21, 2012
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Blue Earth
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit: Appeal
Cause of Action: 28:0158
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
October 2, 2012 3 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting in part and denying in part 1 Motion Leave to Appeal. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/01/2012. (jmf)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ries v. VEC Technology, L.L.C. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Charles W Ries
Represented By: Phillip W Bohl
Represented By: Joy Reopelle Anderson
Represented By: Nicholas H Callahan
Represented By: Kelly W Hoversten
Represented By: Henry T Wang
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: VEC Technology, L.L.C.
Represented By: Amy J Swedberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.