Abdi v. Obama
Plaintiff: Anwar Mohamed Abdi
Defendant: Barack Hussein Obama
Case Number: 0:2012cv02086
Filed: August 24, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1343
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
September 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Adopting 3 Report and Recommendation; Denying 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by Anwar Mohamed Abdi (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 9/17/2012. (PJM) cc: Anwar Mohamed Abdi. Modified on 9/17/2012 (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Abdi v. Obama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Anwar Mohamed Abdi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Barack Hussein Obama
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?