Dane Technologies, Inc. v. Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.
Dane Technologies, Inc. |
Gatekeeper Systems, Inc. |
Gatekeeper Systems, Inc. |
Dane Technologies, Inc. |
0:2012cv02730 |
October 25, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
Hennepin |
Arthur J. Boylan |
Ann D. Montgomery |
Patent |
35 U.S.C. ยง 271 |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 376 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 308 Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.'s First Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 313 Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.'s Second Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 318 Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.'s Third Moti on for Summary Judgment; granting 323 Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.'s Fourth Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 327 Gatekeeper Systems, Inc.'s Fifth Motion for Summary Judgment; granting in part and denying in part 338 Dane Technologies, Inc.'s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 09/29/2015. (TLU) |
Filing 300 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Overruling 279 APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION; Magistrate Judge Keyes January 20, 2015 Order 274 is AFFIRMED (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 03-02-15. (TLU) |
Filing 227 ORDER RE: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION; in interpreting the '379 Patent, the '836 Patent, and the '979 Patent the disputed terms will be construed in accordance with this Order (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 10/17/2014. (TLU) |
Filing 210 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER that in interpreting the '379 Patent, the '836 Patent, and the '979 Patent the disputed terms will be construed in accordance with this Order (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 07/14/2014. (TLU) |
Filing 36 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 15 Defendant's Motion to Stay (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 08/20/2013. (TLU) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.