Bjerkness v. SKF USA, Inc.

Appellant: Dale Harold Bjerkness, II
Appellee: SKF USA, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2012cv02744
Filed: October 26, 2012
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Crow Wing
Referring Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Donovan W. Frank
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 12, 2013 18 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Based upon the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Appellant Dale Harold Bjerkness's Appeal (Doc. No. 1 ) is DENIED. 2. The Bankruptcy Court's September 13, 2012 Order for Judgment is AFFIRMED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 3/12/2013. (BJS)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Bjerkness v. SKF USA, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: Dale Harold Bjerkness, II
Represented By: Jamie R Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: SKF USA, Inc.
Represented By: Robert T Kugler
Represented By: Edwin H Caldie, III
Represented By: Phillip J Ashfield
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?