Henry v. Federal National Mortgage Association

Plaintiff: David Henry
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association
Case Number: 0:2012cv02776
Filed: October 31, 2012
Court: Minnesota District Court
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: David S. Doty
Referring Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Nature of Suit: Fraud or Truth-In-Lending

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
March 4, 2013 11 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Denying 2 Application to Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs filed by David Henry; Adopting 9 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Senior Judge David S. Doty on 3/4/2013. (PJM) cc: David Henry on 3/4/2013 (jam).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Henry v. Federal National Mortgage Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: David Henry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.