Hutchinson v. City of St. Paul et al
| Gerald R Hutchinson |
| Michael McGinn, Laura Boulduan, Jeffrey Lewis, City of St. Paul and David Stokes |
| 0:2013cv00137 |
| January 16, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Ramsey |
| Steven E. Rau |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
AMENDED ORDER. 1. Plaintiff's Motions in Limine (Doc. No. 57 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 2. Defendant Officer David Stokes' (Stokes) Motions in Limine (Doc. No. 44 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 3. Defendants Office r Laura Boulduan (Boulduan), Officer Jeffrey Lewis (Lewis), and the City of St. Paul's (St. Paul) Motions in Limine (Doc. No. 38 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (See Amended Order for additional information.)(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 10/10/2014. (BJS)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER. 1. Plaintiff's Motions in Limine (Doc. No. 57 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 2. Defendant Officer David Stokes' (Stokes) Motions in Limine (Doc. No. 44 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART; 3. Defendants Officer Laur a Boulduan (Boulduan), Officer Jeffrey Lewis (Lewis), and the City of St. Paul's (St. Paul) Motions in Limine (Doc. No. 38 ) are GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. (See Order for additional information.) (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 10/09/2014. (BJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
