Le et al v. Regency Corporation et al
Michelle Le, Jane Geiger, Lindsay Kallenbach, Rachel Thunstrom and Jamie Widmer |
Regency Corporation and J. Hayes Batson |
0:2013cv00391 |
February 18, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Hennepin |
Steven E. Rau |
Donovan W. Frank |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 53 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. Defendants' Motion for Partial Dismissal of Plaintiffs' Class and Collective First Amended Complaint (Doc. No. 44 ) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. To the extent Defendants seek dismis sal of Count I of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint insofar as it asserts a record-keeping claim under the FLSA, the motion is GRANTED. b. To the extent Defendants seek dismissal of Count II of Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint insofar as it assert s a record-keeping claim under the MFLSA, the motion is GRANTED. c. In all other respects, the motion is DENIED. 2. Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, Court Authorized Notice, and Tolling of Statute of Limitations (Doc. No. 14 ) is GRA NTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as follows: a. To the extent Plaintiffs seek conditional class certification, the motion is GRANTED. b. To the extent Plaintiffs seek judicial notice, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART as set forth in detail above. c. To the extent Plaintiffs seek to toll the statute of limitations, the motion is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 7/15/2013. (BJS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.