Larson v. Doody
Appellee: Michael K. Doody
Appellant: David F. Larson
Case Number: 0:2013cv00879
Filed: April 16, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Anoka
Presiding Judge: Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit: Bankruptcy Appeal (801)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 22, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER denying Appellants' appeal from Bankruptcy Court and affirming Bankruptcy Court's 2/27/13 Order for Judgment and 2/27/13 Judgment. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/22/14. (MJC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Larson v. Doody
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellee: Michael K. Doody
Represented By: Karl J. Johnson
Represented By: Timothy Joseph Pramas
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Appellant: David F. Larson
Represented By: Michael D O'Neill
Represented By: Kurt M Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?