Lorenz v. JPMorgan Chase

Plaintiff: Teresa Lorenz
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase
Case Number: 0:2013cv00986
Filed: April 26, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 30, 2014 Filing 50 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 49 granting 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. See Order for details. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on December 30, 2014. (CLG)
May 28, 2014 Filing 37 ORDER denying 28 Motion to Alter/Amend/Supplement Pleadings (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 05/28/14. (BJS) (cc: Teresa Lorenz)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lorenz v. JPMorgan Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JPMorgan Chase
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Teresa Lorenz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?