Cox v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Rachel Cox
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Case Number:
0:2013cv01138
Filed:
May 13, 2013
Court:
Minnesota District Court
County:
Anoka
Referring Judge:
Janie S. Mayeron
Presiding Judge:
Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Jobs
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed | # | Document Text |
---|---|---|
May 27, 2014 | 33 |
![]() |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Cox v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Gina K Janeiro |
Represented By: | Sara G Sidwell |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Rachel Cox | |
Represented By: | Steven Andrew Smith |
Represented By: | Sofia B Andersson-Stern |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.