Hubbell v. American Accounts & Advisors, Inc.
Plaintiff: Katelynn Hubbell
Defendant: American Accounts & Advisors, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2013cv01157
Filed: May 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Carver
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 5, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 19 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Plaintiff's claim under 15 U.S.C. § 1692f is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Defendant's motion as to the remainder of Plaintiff's claims is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 11/5/13. (KMW)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hubbell v. American Accounts & Advisors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: American Accounts & Advisors, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Katelynn Hubbell
Represented By: Thomas J Lyons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?