Perry v. Colvin
Plaintiff: Lucretia Perry
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number: 0:2013cv01185
Filed: May 17, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 20, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER adopting Report and Recommendation 20 -Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 9 is DENIED. The Commissioner's Motion for Summary Judgment 15 is GRANTED. The Commissioner's decision is AFFIRMED. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on August 20, 2014. (CBC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perry v. Colvin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Represented By: Ana H Voss
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lucretia Perry
Represented By: Laura S Melnick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?