Sackett v. Singer et al
Charles David Sackett |
Jeff Singer and Steven Buswell |
0:2013cv01218 |
May 21, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Chisago |
Tony N. Leung |
Ann D. Montgomery |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 ORDER ADOPTING 28 Report and Recommendation, GRANTING 21 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Steven Buswell, Jeff Singer (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 7/7/15. (JME) |
Filing 19 ORDER & MEMORANDUM: 1. Plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 2. The attached memorandum is incorporated herein. 3. All prior consistent orders remain in full force and effect. 4. Failure to comply with any p rovision of this Order or any other prior consistent Order shall subject the non-complying party, non-complying counsel and/or the party such counsel represents to any and all appropriate remedies, sanctions and the like, including without limitatio n: assessment of costs, fines and attorneys' fees and disbursements; waiver of rights to object; exclusion or limitation of witnesses, testimony, exhibits and other evidence; striking of pleadings; complete or partial dismissal with prejudice; entry of whole or partial default judgment; and/or any other relief that this Court may from time to time deem appropriate.(Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 05/22/2014. (MMP) cc: Charles David Sackett on 5/22/2014 (MMP). |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.