Dotstry v. Fisher
Petitioner: Kendrick Ledelle Dotstry
Respondent: Scott Fisher
Case Number: 0:2013cv01424
Filed: June 13, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Pine
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopt Report and Recommendation 9 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 6, 2013. (DML) cc: Dotstry on 12/6/2013 (jam).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dotstry v. Fisher
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Kendrick Ledelle Dotstry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Scott Fisher
Represented By: Pamela Marentette
Represented By: Gregory G Brooker
Represented By: Erika R Mozangue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?