Martin v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Plaintiff: Marie Martin
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Case Number: 0:2013cv01628
Filed: June 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Donovan W. Frank
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Personal Injury: Health Care

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 27, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 8 TRANSFER ORDER (CTO-I) by MDL Panel TRANSFERRING CASE to the District of Minnesota. In Re: Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation, MDL No. 2441. (gba, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)[Transferred from California Northern on 6/28/2013.]
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Martin v. HowMedica Osteonics Corp.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marie Martin
Represented By: Rachel Beth Abrams
Represented By: William A Levin
Represented By: Laurel Lisa Simes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Howmedica Osteonics Corp
Represented By: Arameh Zargham O'Boyle
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?