Carlson v. City of Duluth, Minnesota
Plaintiff: James Robert Carlson
Defendant: City of Duluth, Minnesota
Case Number: 0:2013cv01831
Filed: July 9, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: St. Louis
Presiding Judge: Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge: Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 31 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Temporary Restraining Order 4 is DENIED.(Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 7/18/13. (GRR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Carlson v. City of Duluth, Minnesota
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Duluth, Minnesota
Represented By: Nathan N LaCoursiere
Represented By: M Alison Lutterman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James Robert Carlson
Represented By: David J Malban
Represented By: Randall D B Tigue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?