Bandy v. Commissioner of Correction et al
| Joe H. Bandy, III |
| Beth Verdin, Gallo Rick, Craig Oseland, Jeff Peterson, McDonald Will, Commissioner of Correction, Thane Murphy and Corry Vargason |
| 0:2013cv02209 |
| August 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| Carlton |
| Leo I. Brisbois |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Rejecting Magistrate Judge's 63 Report and Recommendation; construing plaintiff's 67 objection as a motion for voluntary dismissal, all claims against defendant Gallo are dismissed without prejudice; denying as moot defendant Gallo's 15 Motion to Dismiss. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on September 29, 2014. (DML) cc: Bandy on 9/29/2014 (JAM).
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 10 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by McDonald Will, 56 Motion for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Joe H. Bandy, III, 38 Motion to Dismiss/General filed by Thane Murphy,(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 15, 2014. (HAZ) cc: Joe H. Bandy, III on 5/16/2014 (MMP).
|
|
Filing
7
MEMORNDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting plaintiff's 2 Application on Proceed in District Court without Prepaying Fees or Costs; Rejecting Magistrate Judge's 3 Report and Recommendation. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on January 2, 2014. (DML) (cc: Joe H. Bandy, III)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
