Perez v. Jett
Petitioner: Tomas Lorenzo Perez
Respondent: B.R. Jett
Case Number: 0:2013cv02217
Filed: August 15, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
County: Olmsted
Presiding Judge: Janie S. Mayeron
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER ADOPTING 15 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION as MODIFIED and as stated herein; Petitioner's petition for a writ of habeas corpus 1 is DENIED; This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of jurisdiction (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 02/06/2015. (TLU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Perez v. Jett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Tomas Lorenzo Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: B.R. Jett
Represented By: Gregory G Brooker
Represented By: Erika R Mozangue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?