Wilson v. National Security Agency
Plaintiff: Cedric M. Wilson
Defendant: National Security Agency
Case Number: 0:2013cv02330
Filed: August 23, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Ramsey
Presiding Judge: Joan N. Ericksen
Presiding Judge: Franklin L. Noel
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 7, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 3 - Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. This action is SUMMARILY DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i). (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on October 7, 2013. (CBC) cc: Cedric Wilson on 10/7/2013 (MMP). Modified text on 10/7/2013 (MMP).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wilson v. National Security Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: National Security Agency
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cedric M. Wilson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?