Peterson v. United States Postal Service
Plaintiff: Douglas A. Peterson
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Case Number: 0:2013cv02363
Filed: August 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Washington
Presiding Judge: Arthur J. Boylan
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
February 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 13 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction; all claims alleged in the Complaint [1-1] are DISMISSED(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 02/07/2014. (TLU) (cc: Douglas A. Peterson) Modified on 2/7/2014 (jz).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Peterson v. United States Postal Service
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: United States Postal Service
Represented By: Bahram Samie
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Douglas A. Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?