Arradondo v. City of Minneapolis

Plaintiff: Brian Arradondo
Defendant: City of Minneapolis
Case Number: 0:2013cv02488
Filed: September 11, 2013
Court: Minnesota District Court
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Referring Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: Richard H. Kyle
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: Defendant

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 10, 2015 43 Opinion or Order of the Court ORDER granting 24 Motion for Summary Judgment and Dismissing [1-Attachment 2] Complaint with prejudice.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Richard H. Kyle on 08/10/15. (KLL)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Arradondo v. City of Minneapolis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Brian Arradondo
Represented By: Andrea F Rubenstein
Represented By: Lawrence P Schaefer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Minneapolis
Represented By: Andrea Kloehn Naef
Represented By: Timothy S Skarda
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?