Dicken,et al. v. Northwest Eye Center, P.A., et al.
| United States of America, ex rel. and Robert A. Dicken |
| Northwest Eye Center, P.A., Christopher J. Borgen, Eric M. Tjelle and Sanford Health Network |
| 0:2013cv02691 |
| October 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Scott |
| Joan N. Ericksen |
| Katherine M. Menendez |
| Qui Tam (31 U.S.C. § 3729(a)) |
| 31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
125
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 112 Motion to Compel; denying 112 Motion for Sanctions(Written Opinion) Signed by Magistrate Judge Katherine M. Menendez on 6/14/2018. (LCC)
|
|
Filing
91
ORDER: (1) Plaintiff Robert A. Dicken's motion to vacate and for leave to amend [Dkt. No. 77 ] is GRANTED IN PART, to the extent Plaintiff Robert A. Dicken requests the Court to vacate the February 28, 2017 Judgment and grant leave to amend. (2 ) The February 28, 2017 Judgment [Dkt. No. 76 ] is VACATED. (3) Plaintiff Robert A. Dicken is GRANTED leave to file a Second Amended Complaint within ten days of this Order. The Second Amended Complaint must comply with this Order and be in substantially the same form as the one proposed at Dkt. No. [80-1], together with any incorporated exhibits. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on May 30, 2017. (CBC)
|
|
Filing
75
ORDER: (1) Defendants Northwest Eye Center, P.A., Dr. Christopher J. Borgen, and Dr. Eric M. Tjelle's joint Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 49 ] is GRANTED for the reasons stated in this Order. (2) Defendant Sanford Health Network's Motion to Dismiss [Dkt. No. 60 ] is GRANTED for the reasons stated in this Order. (3) Count III of the Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (4) Counts I, II, IV, V, VI, and VII of the Amended Complaint are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Joan N. Ericksen on February 27, 2017. (CBC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
