Stratasys Inc. v. Microboards Technology, LLC
Plaintiff: |
Stratasys Inc. |
Defendant: |
Microboards Technology, LLC |
Case Number: |
0:2013cv03228 |
Filed: |
November 25, 2013 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Office: |
DMN Office |
County: |
Hennepin |
Presiding Judge: |
Donovan W. Frank |
Presiding Judge: |
Jeanne J. Graham |
Nature of Suit: |
Patent |
Cause of Action: |
35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
June 23, 2015 |
Filing
160
ORDER OPINION: 1. Afinia's Motion (ECF No. 110 ) is DENIED; 2. Because the Court finds this motion was substantially justified, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(5)(B), each party shall bear its own costs and expenses in connection with this Motion ; 3. All prior consistent orders remain in full force and effect; and 4. Failure to comply with any provision of this Order or any other prior consistent Order shall subject the non-complying party, non-complying counsel, and/or the party such coun sel represents to any and all appropriate remedies, sanctions, and the like, including without limitation: assessment of costs, fines and attorneys fees and disbursements; waiver of rights to object; exclusion or limitation of witnesses, testimony , exhibits, and other evidence; striking of pleadings; complete or partial dismissal with prejudice; entry of whole or partial default judgment; and/or any other relief that this Court may from time to time deem appropriate. (Written Opinion). Signed by Magistrate Judge Tony N. Leung on 06/23/2015. (MMP)
|
April 10, 2015 |
Filing
145
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Inter Partes Review of the Asserted Patents (Doc. No. 120 ) is DENIED.3 This denial is without prejudice to a parties' ability renew the motion to stay the proceedings should the IPR Petitions be granted.(Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 4/10/2015. (BJS)
|
October 22, 2014 |
Filing
101
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Defendant's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 46 ) is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.(Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 10/22/2014. (BJS)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?