Wong v. Minnesota Department of Human Services et al
| Eric Wong |
| Minnesota Department of Human Services, Lucinda Jesson, Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department and Rex A. Holzemer |
| 0:2013cv03378 |
| December 9, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Donovan W. Frank |
| Janie S. Mayeron |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
124
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Magistrate Judge Steven E. Rau's March 29, 2018 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 122 ) is ADOPTED. Defendants Hennepin County Human Services and Public Health Department and Rex A. Holzemer' s Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v) (Doc. No. 102 ) is GRANTED. Defendants Minnesota Department of Human Services and Emily Johnson Piper's Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(b)(2)(A)(v) (Doc. No. 109 ) is GRANTED. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 4/18/2018. (las)
|
|
Filing
33
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. 1. State Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 16 ) is GRANTED. 2. County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc. No. 22 ) is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff's Complaint (Doc. No. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed by Judge Donovan W. Frank on 9/26/2014. (BJS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
