Munt v. Grandlienard

Munt v. Grandlienard

Plaintiff:	Joel Marvin Munt
Defendant:	Kent Grandlienard
Case Number:	0:2013cv03573
Filed:	December 19, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Washington
Presiding Judge:	Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge:	Susan Richard Nelson
Nature of Suit:	General
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
October 26, 2023	Filing 55 ORDER denying 51 Motion for Relief from Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/26/2023. (MJC)
January 12, 2015	Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART, AND DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Petitioner's Objections [Doc. No. 28] to the Magistrate Judge's November 4, 2014, R & R are OVERRULED IN PART AND SUSTAINED IN PART; 2. The Court ADOPTS IN PART AND DECLINES TO ADOPT IN PART the Magistrate Judge's R & R [Doc. No. 24]; 3. Petitioner's Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody [Doc. No. 11] is DENIED; 4. Petitioner&# 039;s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 5. A Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED only as to Petitioner's Sixth Amendment claim for the right to an impartial jury to the extent that it relates to the state district court's failure to remove juror B.S. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/12/2015. (LDB)

Date Filed

Document Text

October 26, 2023

Filing 55 ORDER denying 51 Motion for Relief from Judgment (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 10/26/2023. (MJC)

January 12, 2015

Filing 31 ORDER ADOPTING IN PART, AND DECLINING TO ADOPT IN PART, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. 1. Petitioner's Objections [Doc. No. 28] to the Magistrate Judge's November 4, 2014, R & R are OVERRULED IN PART AND SUSTAINED IN PART; 2. The Court ADOPTS IN PART AND DECLINES TO ADOPT IN PART the Magistrate Judge's R & R [Doc. No. 24]; 3. Petitioner's Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody [Doc. No. 11] is DENIED; 4. Petitioner&# 039;s claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and 5. A Certificate of Appealability is GRANTED only as to Petitioner's Sixth Amendment claim for the right to an impartial jury to the extent that it relates to the state district court's failure to remove juror B.S. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 1/12/2015. (LDB)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Munt v. Grandlienard
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Joel Marvin Munt
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Kent Grandlienard
Represented By:	James B Early
Represented By:	Matthew Frank
Represented By:	Patrick Raymond McDermott
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?