Arctic Cat, Inc. et al v. Polaris Industries Inc. et al
| Arctic Cat, Inc. and Arctic Cat Sales Inc. |
| Polaris Industries Inc. |
| 0:2013cv03579 |
| December 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Michael J. Davis |
| Franklin L. Noel |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 145 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 77 Motion to Compel filed by Arctic Cat Sales Inc., Arctic Cat, Inc (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on June 11, 2015. (HAZ)
|
|
Filing
100
ORDER MODIFYING THE REPORT AND ADOPTING THE RECOMMENDATION for 49 Motion to Consolidate Cases filed by Arctic Cat Sales Inc., Arctic Cat, Inc., and 68 Report and Recommendation. Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate Cases for Pretrial Purposes is GRANTED (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on May 12, 2015. (HAZ)
|
|
Filing
40
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER (1) Granting in part and denying in part Polaris' (15) Motion to Dismiss in case 0:13-cv-03579-JRT-FLN. (a)The motion is denied to the extent it seeks discretionary dismissal of A rctic Cat's claims for declaratory judgment (Counts I, II, and III). (b) The motion is also denied with respect to Arctic Cat's claim for breach of contract (Count IV). (c) The motion is granted with respect to Arctic Cat's claims f or fraud (Count V), unenforceability of the '220 Patent (Count VI), unenforceability of the '125 and '405 Patents (Count VII), Walker Process fraud (Count VIII), and sham litigation (Count IX). These claims are dismissed with prejudic e. (2) Granting in part and denying in part Arctic Cat's (17) Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative to Consolidate Cases in case 0:13-cv-03595-JRT-FLN. (a) The motion is denied to the extent it seeks dismissal of Polaris compla int. (b) The motion is granted to the extent it seeks consolidation of the above-captioned cases. All documents will be filed in civil case number 13-3579. The caption of civil case number 13-3579 will remain unchanged: Arctic Cat, Inc. and Arcti c Cat Sales, Inc. will remain listed as Plaintiffs and Polaris Industries, Inc., both the Minnesota and Delaware corporations, will remain listed as Defendants. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on October 20, 2014. Associated Cases: 0:13-cv-03579-JRT-FLN, 0:13-cv-03595-JRT-FLN(DML)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
