Diaz v. Greatbatch Ltd.
Plaintiff: Francisca Diaz
Defendant: Greatbatch Ltd.
Case Number: 0:2014cv00735
Filed: March 14, 2014
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Hennepin
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Presiding Judge: John R. Tunheim
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 34 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 33 Report and Recommendation. Case dismissed without prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on December 18, 2014. (HAZ) cc: Francisca Diaz. Modified on 12/19/2014 (lmb).
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Diaz v. Greatbatch Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Greatbatch Ltd.
Represented By: Rachel M Bowe
Represented By: Gina K Janeiro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Francisca Diaz
Represented By: Matthew S Nolan
Represented By: Frances E Baillon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?