Richmond v. State of Minnesota

Richmond v. State of Minnesota

Plaintiff:	Courtney Richmond
Defendant:	State of Minnesota
Case Number:	0:2014cv00749
Filed:	March 17, 2014
Court:	US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office:	DMN Office
County:	Hennepin
Presiding Judge:	Leo I. Brisbois
Presiding Judge:	Michael J. Davis
Nature of Suit:	Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 28, 2014	Filing 24 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Courtney Richmond's Motion for Reconsideration 22 is DENIED. 2. Line 2 of Paragraph 4 on page 2 of the April 21, 2014 Order 11 is amended to read "§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii)." (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/28/14. (GRR) cc: Richmond on 5/28/2014 (JAM).
April 21, 2014	Filing 11 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated March 21, 2014 4 . 2. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint 3 is DENIED. 4. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §191(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 4/21/14. (GRR)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 28, 2014

Filing 24 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. Plaintiff Courtney Richmond's Motion for Reconsideration 22 is DENIED. 2. Line 2 of Paragraph 4 on page 2 of the April 21, 2014 Order 11 is amended to read "§ 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii)." (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/28/14. (GRR) cc: Richmond on 5/28/2014 (JAM).

April 21, 2014

Filing 11 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Leo I. Brisbois dated March 21, 2014 4 . 2. Plaintiff's application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is DENIED. 3. Plaintiff's motion to amend the complaint 3 is DENIED. 4. This action is summarily DISMISSED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §191(e)(2)(B)(ii) and (iii). LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 4/21/14. (GRR)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richmond v. State of Minnesota
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: State of Minnesota
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Courtney Richmond
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?