Mountain Marketing Group, LLC v. Heimerl & Lammers, LLC
Mountain Marketing Group, LLC |
Heimerl & Lammers, LLC |
0:2014cv00846 |
March 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
DMN Office |
XX US, Outside State |
Susan Richard Nelson |
Franklin L. Noel |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 |
Both |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 144 ORDER denying 95 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 99 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. A separate pretrial order will follow, setting this matter on for trial on Monday, December 14, 2015. (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 09/23/2015. (SMD) |
Filing 116 ORDER overruling 88 APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION to District Judge. The Court affirms the Magistrate Judge's May 19, 2015 Order 84 . (Written Opinion) Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 07/27/15. (SMD) |
Filing 67 ORDER denying 64 APPEAL/OBJECTION OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE DECISION. Defendant's Objections [Doc. No. 64] to the Magistrate Judge's April 9, 2015 Order are OVERRULED; 2. The Court AFFIRMS the Magistrate Judge's April 9, 2015 Order [Doc. No. 63]; and 3. Defendant's Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer [Doc. No. 52] is DENIED. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Susan Richard Nelson on 4/29/15. (LDB) |
Filing 19 ORDER granting 10 Motion to transfer case to District of Minnesota. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/27/2014. (voc) [Transferred from Wisconsin Western on 3/27/2014.] |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.