The Chlorine Institute. Inc. et al v. Soo Line Railroad
Plaintiff: Erco Worldwide, The Fertilizer Institute, The American Chemistry Council, The Chlorine Institute. Inc. and PVS Chemicals
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad
Case Number: 0:2014cv01029
Filed: April 10, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: XX US, Outside State
Presiding Judge: Steven E. Rau
Presiding Judge: Patrick J. Schiltz
Nature of Suit: Commercial/ICC Rates/etc.
Cause of Action: 49 U.S.C. ยง 10101
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 27, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER - Based on the foregoing, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT: Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction 7 is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under the doctrine of primary jurisdiction. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Patrick J. Schiltz on 05/27/14. (BJS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: The Chlorine Institute. Inc. et al v. Soo Line Railroad
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Erco Worldwide
Represented By: Jennifer L Young
Represented By: Stephen P Laitinen
Represented By: Paul M Donovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Fertilizer Institute
Represented By: Jennifer L Young
Represented By: Stephen P Laitinen
Represented By: Paul M Donovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The American Chemistry Council
Represented By: Jennifer L Young
Represented By: Stephen P Laitinen
Represented By: Paul M Donovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: The Chlorine Institute. Inc.
Represented By: Jennifer L Young
Represented By: Stephen P Laitinen
Represented By: Paul M Donovan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: PVS Chemicals
Represented By: Paul M Donovan
Represented By: Stephen P Laitinen
Represented By: Jennifer L Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Soo Line Railroad
Represented By: Kevin M Decker
Represented By: Michael M Sawers
Represented By: Jonathan P Schmidt
Represented By: Timothy R Thornton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?