Olson v. Push, Inc.
Plaintiff: Shawn Olson
Defendant: Push, Inc.
Case Number: 0:2014cv01163
Filed: April 16, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Minnesota
Office: DMN Office
County: Dakota
Presiding Judge: Jeffrey J. Keyes
Presiding Judge: Ann D. Montgomery
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 19, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting 5 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss; all claims in the Complaint [1-1] are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge Ann D. Montgomery on 08/19/2014. (TLU)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Olson v. Push, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Shawn Olson
Represented By: Mark A Greenman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Push, Inc.
Represented By: Andrew E Tanick
Represented By: Brian M.W. Cunningham
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?