Ferrari v. Best Buy Co., Inc. et al
Plaintiff: |
Rick Ferrari |
Defendant: |
Best Buy Co., Inc., BestBuy Stores, L.P. and Bestbuy.com, LLC |
Case Number: |
0:2014cv02956 |
Filed: |
July 21, 2014 |
Court: |
US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
Office: |
DMN Office |
County: |
XX US, Outside State |
Presiding Judge: |
Michael J. Davis |
Presiding Judge: |
Franklin L. Noel |
Nature of Suit: |
Other Fraud |
Cause of Action: |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Jury Demanded By: |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Date Filed |
Document Text |
May 12, 2015 |
Filing
66
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 48 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: 1. To the extent Best Buy seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's claims under the Minnesota Unfair Trade Practices Act, the Minnesota Prevention of Consumer Fraud Act, and the Min nesota Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (Plaintiff's First Cause of Action), the motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing. 2. To the extent Best Buy seeks to dismiss all of Plaintiff 's claims for products he did not purchase and advertising he did not see, the motion is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of standing. Specifically, Plaintiff's claims are limited to televisions w ith the model number NS-65D260A13 and for advertising and marketing on the television box itself. 3. To the extent Best Buy seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief, the motion is DENIED. 4. To the extent Best Buy seeks to dismis s Plaintiff's claims for failure to adequately plead allegations of fraud, the motion is DENIED. 5. To the extent Best Buy seeks to dismiss Plaintiff's claims for failing to plausibly allege a price premium injury, the motion is DENIED 16 . (Written Opinion). Signed by Chief Judge Michael J. Davis on 5/12/15. (GRR)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?