Lakes and Parks Alliance of Minneapolis v. Federal Transit Administration et al
| Lakes and Parks Alliance of Minneapolis |
| Federal Transit Administration, Metropolitan Council, the and Susan Haigh |
| 0:2014cv03391 |
| September 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Minnesota |
| DMN Office |
| Hennepin |
| Steven E. Rau |
| John R. Tunheim |
| Environmental Matters |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 4332 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
151
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT: Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment 132 is Denied. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 138 is Granted. (Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on 2/27/2018. (JMK)
|
|
Filing
78
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying plaintiff's 13 Motion for Summary Judgment(Written Opinion) Signed by Chief Judge John R. Tunheim on August 4, 2015. (DML)
|
|
Filing
69
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER 1. Granting in part and denying in part Met Council's 36 Motion to Dismiss. The motion is GRANTED as to the LPA's MEPA claim. The LPA's MEPA claim against the Met Council i s dismissed without prejudice. The motion is DENIED as to the LPA's NEPA and state municipal consent statute claims. 2. Granting FTA's 30 Motion to Dismiss. The LPA's claim against the FTA is dismissed without prejudice. (Written Opinion). Signed by Judge John R. Tunheim on March 6, 2015. (DML)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Minnesota District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
